 Горлов И.Ф., Федотова Г.В., Сергеев В.Н.
https://doi.org/10.31208/2618-7353-2021-14-82-89
АННОТАЦИЯ / ABSTRACT
Цель
Оценить и проанализировать структуру производства сельскохозяйственной продукции и общие объемы потерь при ее транспортировке, реализации и переработке.
Материалы и методы
Научное исследование было основано на оценке отчетных агрегированных статистических данных по объемам производства сельскохозяйственной продукции в России. В работе были использованы методы графического, статистического анализа, методы аналогии и сравнения, генезиса и синтеза научных знаний.
Результаты
Подсчитаны валовые объемы производства сельскохозяйственной продукции (280 млн. руб.), определены объемы реализованной продукции (8,25 трлн. руб.), объемы продукции, направленные на личное потребление (81 млн. руб.), а также подсчитаны общие потери продукции в процессе ее реализации и потребления, транспортировки до конечного потребителя (48 млн. тонн). Сделаны выводы, что производители сегодня фактически нацелены на экспорт сырья, без его последующей переработки и хранения по причине отсутствия налаженных логистических путей и необходимых мощностей для его длительного хранения. Были разработаны рекомендации по развитию инфраструктуры длительного хранения и последующей переработке сельскохозяйственной продукции.
Заключение
Сделаны выводы о необходимости пересмотра существующей системы логистических поставок и транспортировок сельскохозяйственной продукции с поля до хранилища или производителя. Для успешной интенсификации существующего процесса внутренней переработки сельскохозяйственной продукции необходимо увеличивать мощности хранения и замораживания сырья.
Aim
Assess and analyze the structure of agricultural production and the total amount of losses during its transportation, sale and processing.
Materials and Methods
The scientific research was based on an assessment of the reported aggregated statistical data on the volume of agricultural production in Russia. Methods of graphic, statistical analysis, methods of analogy and comparison, genesis and synthesis of scientific knowledge were used in the work.
Results
The gross volumes of agricultural production were calculated (280 million rubles), the volumes of products sold (8.25 trillion rubles) aimed at personal consumption were determined (81 million rubles), and the total losses of products in the process of their sale and consumption, and transportation to the final consumer were calculated (48 million tons). It was concluded that manufacturers today are actually aimed at exporting raw materials, without its subsequent processing and storage due to the lack of established logistics routes and the necessary capacities for its long-term storage. Recommendations were developed for the development of infrastructure for long-term storage and subsequent processing of agricultural products.
Conclusion
The gross volumes of agricultural production were calculated (280 million rubles), the volumes of products sold (8.25 trillion rubles) aimed at personal consumption were determined (81 million rubles), and the total losses of products in the process of their sale and consumption, and transportation to the final consumer were calculated (48 million tons). It was concluded that manufacturers today are actually aimed at exporting raw materials, without its subsequent processing and storage due to the lack of established logistics routes and the necessary capacities for its long-term storage. Recommendations were developed for the development of infrastructure for long-term storage and subsequent processing of agricultural products.
АВТОРЫ / AUTHORS
Г. В. Федотова
Поволжский научно-исследовательский институт производства и переработки мясомолочной продукции, Волгоград, Россия
Гилян В. Федотова, доктор экономических наук, доцент и главный научный сотрудник отдела по хранению и переработке сельскохозяйственной продукции
E-mail: g_evgeeva@mail.ru; тел. 8 (8442) 39-10-48
И. Ф. Горлов
Поволжский научно-исследовательский институт производства и переработки мясомолочной продукции, Волгоград, Россия
Иван Ф. Горлов
В. Н. Сергеев
Академия продовольственной безопасности, Москва, Россия
Валерий Н. Сергеев
About the Authors
G. V. Fedotova
Volga Region Research Institute of Manufacture and Processing of Meat-and-Milk Production, Volgograd, Russian Federation
Gylian V. Fedotova,
E-mail: g_evgeeva@mail.ru; tel. +7(8442) 39-10-48
I. F. Gorlov
Volga Region Research Institute of Manufacture and Processing of Meat-and-Milk Production, Volgograd, Russian Federation
Ivan F. Gorlov
V. N. Sergeev
Academy of food safety, Moscow, Russian Federation
Valery N. Sergeev
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ / REFERENCES
1. Горлов И.Ф., Мосолова Н.И., Суркова С.А. Основные направления по разработке аграрно-пищевых технологий // Аграрно-пищевые инновации. 2019. Т. 6, N 2. C. 7-8. DOI: 10.31208/2618-7353-2019-6-7-8
2. Brennan S.F., Lavelle F., Moore S.E., Dean M., McKinley M.C., McCole P. Food environment intervention improves food knowledge, wellbeing and dietary habits in primary school children: Project Daire, a randomised-controlled, factorial design cluster trial // International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. December 2020. Volume 18. Issue 1. P. 10-16. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01086-y
3. Fedotova G.V., Gorlov I.F. COVID-2019 pandemic as a trigger for a new food crisis // National interests: Priorities and Security. 2020. Vol. 16. Iss. 9. P. 1622-1635. DOI: 10.24891/ni.16.9.1622
4. Gorlov I.F., Fedotova G.V., Glushchenko A.V., Slozenkina M.I., Mosolova N.I. Digital Technologies in the Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex // Digital Economy: Complexity and Variety vs. Rationality. 2020. Vol. 87. P. 220-229. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29586-8
5. Knorr D., Augustin M.A. Food processing needs, advantages and misconceptions // Trends in Food Science & Technology. February 2021. Volume 108. Pages 103-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.026
6. Li Y., Yang K., Chen J., Gupta S., Ning F. Can an apology change after-crisis user attitude? The role of social media in online crisis management // Information Technology & People. 2019. Vol. 32. Iss. 4. P. 802-827. DOI: 10.1108/ITP-03-2017-0103
7. Lin Y., Liang B., Zhu X. The effect of inventory performance on product quality: The mediating effect of financial performance // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2018. Vol. 35. Iss. 10. P. 2227-2247. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-08-2017-0162
8. Mani S., Mishra M. Non-monetary levers to enhance employee engagement in organizations – “GREAT” model of motivation during the Covid-19 crisis // Strategic HR Review. 2020. Vol. 19. Iss. 4. P. 171-175. DOI: 10.1108/SHR-04-2020-0028
9. Salaev B.K., Natyrov A.K., Solodova S.V., Slozhenkina M.I., Fedotova G.V., Mosolova D.A. Impact of food quality on the economic security // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 677. 032008.
References
1. Gorlov I.F., Mosolova N.I., Surkova S.A. The main directions for the development of agro-food technologies. Agrarian-and-food innovations, 2019, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 7-8. (In Russian) DOI: 10.31208/2618-7353-2019-6-7-8
2. Brennan S.F., Lavelle F., Moore S.E., Dean M., McKinley M.C., McCole P. Food environment intervention improves food knowledge, wellbeing and dietary habits in primary school children: Project Daire, a randomised-controlled, factorial design cluster trial // International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. December 2020. Volume 18. Issue 1. P. 10-16. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01086-y
3. Fedotova G.V., Gorlov I.F. COVID-2019 pandemic as a trigger for a new food crisis // National interests: Priorities and Security. 2020. Vol. 16. Iss. 9. P. 1622-1635. DOI: 10.24891/ni.16.9.1622
4. Gorlov I.F., Fedotova G.V., Glushchenko A.V., Slozenkina M.I., Mosolova N.I. Digital Technologies in the Development of the Agro-Industrial Complex // Digital Economy: Complexity and Variety vs. Rationality. 2020. Vol. 87. P. 220-229. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29586-8
5. Knorr D., Augustin M.A. Food processing needs, advantages and misconceptions // Trends in Food Science & Technology. February 2021. Volume 108. Pages 103-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.026
6. Li Y., Yang K., Chen J., Gupta S., Ning F. Can an apology change after-crisis user attitude? The role of social media in online crisis management // Information Technology & People. 2019. Vol. 32. Iss. 4. P. 802-827. DOI: 10.1108/ITP-03-2017-0103
7. Lin Y., Liang B., Zhu X. The effect of inventory performance on product quality: The mediating effect of financial performance // International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2018. Vol. 35. Iss. 10. P. 2227-2247. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-08-2017-0162
8. Mani S., Mishra M. Non-monetary levers to enhance employee engagement in organizations – “GREAT” model of motivation during the Covid-19 crisis // Strategic HR Review. 2020. Vol. 19. Iss. 4. P. 171-175. DOI: 10.1108/SHR-04-2020-0028
9. Salaev B.K., Natyrov A.K., Solodova S.V., Slozhenkina M.I., Fedotova G.V., Mosolova D.A. Impact of food quality on the economic security // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 677. 032008.
Ключевые слова:
сельскохозяйственная продукция, переработка, хранение, потери, экспорт
Key words:
agricultural products, processing, storage, losses, export
Для цитирования:
Горлов И.Ф., Федотова Г.В., Сергеев В.Н. Проблемы сокращения потерь сельскохозяйственной продукции. Аграрно-пищевые инновации. 2021; 14(2):82-89. http://doi.org/10.31208/2618-7353-2021-14-82-89
For citation:
Gorlov I.F., Fedotova G.V., Sergeev V.N. Problems of reducing losses of agricultural products. Agrarian-and-food innovations. 2021; 14(2):82-89. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.31208/2618-7353-2021-14-82-89 | 